Volume 10, Issue 3: 140-143; May 27, 2020  
ISSN 2228-7701  
PARTICIPATORY EVALUATION OF IMPROVED FEED TECHNOLOGIES TO  
ENHANCE SMALL RUMINANT FATTENING ON PASTORALIST RESEARCH  
GROUP (PRG) MEMBERS IN CHIFRA DISTRICT OF AFAR NATIONAL  
REGIONAL STATE  
Mohammed Nuru1 and Mohammed Yasin2  
1Socioeconomics associate researcher; Afar Pastoral and Agropastoral Research Institute, APARI, Ethiopia  
2Animal production lecturer; Wollo University, Ethiopia  
Email: mnuru2000i@yahoomail.com  
Supporting Information  
ABSTRACT: The causes for low productivity of sheep and goat include poor veterinary services, inadequate  
quantity and quality of feed. Among these limiting factors, poor feed supply and feeding system is the most  
important. The objectives of this project were to demonstrate and evaluate Urea Molasses Multi-Nutrient Blocks  
(UMMNB) and concentrates mix feed technologies in participatory manner through Pastoralist Research Group  
(PRG) approach and look in to the perception and opinions of agro-pastoralist to the new feed and feeding  
techniques.  
the PRG members, 6 trial agro-  
The PRG has 25 members and was established a year ago. Among  
pastoralists were selected by the PRG members purposefully to implement the experiment.  
A total of 36 small  
ruminants (sheep and goat) were used for the trial. Training on UMMB preparation, formulation of concentrate  
feed, animal management and data collection were given for PRG members and Development Agents (DAs). The  
demonstration and evaluation trial were lasts for 4 months data collection period. Data were collected by the trial  
PRG agro-pastoralist throughout the trial period with close follow up of DAs and woreda experts. For data analysis  
purpose the researchers used descriptive statistics. The results showed that the final body weight and daily body  
weight gain was higher in grazing when supplemented with concentrates mix (Treatment 3) in compared to  
grazing + urea molasses block supplementation (T2) and control one/free grazing (T1). The partial budget  
analysis also indicated that small ruminant daily weight gain for 4 months with supplementation of concentrate  
mix supplemented groups (T3) was found to give on average economic return of 250 Ethiopian Birr (ETB) or 6.70  
Euro per head. From this study, it can be concluded that the supplementation concentrate mix for small  
ruminants (sheep and goat) has better weight gain and economically feasible for the chifera district PRG  
established in 2017. It was also economical at PRG level, with average gross profit of 250 ETB per head in chifera  
area. Because of this, so money agro-pastoralists has been attracted by the business and engaged in small  
ruminant fattening practices by purchasing animals from market place without external advice and support.  
Key words: Small ruminant,  
INTRODUCTION  
Feed technology, Pastoralist research group  
Urea molasses block,  
Sheep and goats, with their small body size, high reproductive capacity and rapid growth rates are ideally suited to  
production by resource-poor smallholders. They can be integrated into the overall production system, absorbing surplus  
labor and consuming small amounts of otherwise unused feed. Despite a large population and the contribution of the  
national and regional sheep and goat flock to the export earnings of the country Ethiopia in general and Afar region in  
particular as well as the livelihoods of households in rural and semi urban areas, their productivity is very limited. The  
causes for low productivity of sheep and goat are multifaceted and include poor veterinary services, inadequate quantity  
and quality of feed. Among these limiting factors, poor feed supply and feeding system is the most important (Alemayehu,  
2002).  
Extensive sheep and goat production under the traditional communal grazing/ browsing system is widely practiced  
in Afar region. Pasture, crop residues and browses are the main feed supply to sheep and goat in the region and such  
types of feeds rarely satisfy the maintenance requirements of animals. Most of the available feeds are noted for their poor  
feeding value in terms of protein and energy contents besides their low digestibility.) Some studies, reported that in semi-  
arid and tropical ecosystems, the quality of forages decreases greatly during the dry season, leading to substantial weight  
2012). This phenomenon requires the alleviation of nutrients deficiency in animals through implementing different feed  
utilization strategies. Even though many studies were taken place on small ruminants in Ethiopia most of the technologies  
were not transferred to end users and farmers. As a result, the small ruminant development in smallholder farms remains  
unchanged. Hence there is a need to search for alternative technologies, which could improve the nutritive value of the  
poor-quality feeds to enhance the production of small ruminant. There are different techniques that could improve the  
140  
Citation: Nuru M and Yasin M, (2020). Participatory evaluation of improved feed technologies to enhance small ruminant fattening on pastoralist research group (PRG)  
members in Chifra district of Afar national regional state. Online J. Anim. Feed Res., 10(3): 140-143. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.36380/scil.2020.ojafr19  
feeding value of basal diet among which urea treatment legume supplementation and concentrates supplementation are  
well known for their technical and economic feasibility under smallholder Agro-pastoralist especially in developing  
countries. Moreover, semi-intensified market-oriented fattening of small ruminant has the potential to make smallholder  
Agro-pastoralist/ pastoralist more profitable.  
Objectives of the Study  
General objective: The general objectives of this study were to demonstrate and evaluate Urea Molasses Multi-  
Nutrient Block/UMMNB/ and concentrates mix feed technology in participatory manner through PRG approach and look  
in to the perception and opinions of Agro-pastoralist to the new feed and feeding techniques.  
Specific objectives: A) To evaluate the response of small ruminants (goat & sheep) to the new alternative feed  
source-based feeding under smallholder Agro-pastoralist during drought season; B) To see the perception of Agro-  
pastoralist to the new feed and feeding techniques.  
METHODS AND MATERIALS  
Description of the study area  
The study was undertaken in Chifra district of zone one (Awsi Rasu) of the Afar Regional State. It is located south west  
of Semera on the main road of Mile to Woldiya, which is about 162 km from the regional capital city (Semera) and  
bordered on the south by Mille, on the west by Amhara Region, on the north by the Administrative Zone four (Fantena  
Rasu), and on the East by Dubti (Zone one). The total land area of the district is about 173,374 ha of which the largest area  
is rangeland (APARDB, 2006). The average temperature of the area is about 29oC, and the rainfall is bimodal with erratic  
distribution, with the long rainy season (Kerma) is between Mid-June to Mid-September and the short rainy season (Sugum)  
district falls below 850 m.a.s.l. The dominant soil types in these areas are black, sandy, vertosols and deposits of silt and  
fine sand particles occur in the plain flat areas where cultivation is practiced (APARDB, 2006). The study area consists of  
19 pastoral associations of these 13 of the associations are pastoralists, which entirely depend on livestock production. The  
remaining 6 associations are agro-pastoralists. The district has an estimated total population of 91,078, of which 50,859  
are males and 40,219 are females; 9,132 or 10.02% of its population are urban dwellers and the household numbers are  
Sampling methods of the study  
the PRG members, six trial agro-pastoralists were  
The PRG having 25 members were established in 2017. Among  
selected by the PRG members purposefully to implement the experiment.  
Each treatment was tested by each trial  
pastoralist. From all trial agro-pastoralists, 36 animals were contributed for the trial (fattening). A total of 36 small  
ruminants (sheep and goat) were used for the trial, thus each of the six pastoralists had six small ruminants. Training was a  
crucial component in introducing any new technology. Training on UMMB preparation, formulation of concentrate feed,  
animal management and data collection were given for PRG members and DAs. The demonstration and evaluation trial  
were lasts for 4 months data collection period. Data's were collected by the trial PRG Agro-pastoralist throughout the trial  
period with close follow up of DA’s and woreda experts. Finally, data were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as  
(percentage, ranges, etc.).  
Treatments  
Grazing (Traditional) (T1)  
Grazing (improved pasture) + Urea molasses block supplementation (T2)  
Grazing (improved pasture) + Concentrates mix supplementation (T3)  
Table 1 - Ration Formulation  
Concentrate mix  
Urea Molasses Multi Nutrient Block/UMMNB/  
Remarks  
Items  
Percentage (%)  
Items  
Percentage (%)  
Cottonseed cake  
Wheat bran  
Salt  
49  
50  
1
Molasses  
Urea  
40  
10  
10  
5
25  
10  
100  
N.B:2.5% of their body  
weight level of  
supplement given to the  
animal.  
Cement  
Salt  
Wheat bran  
Cotton seed cake  
Total  
Total  
100  
141  
Citation: Nuru M and Yasin M, (2020). Participatory evaluation of improved feed technologies to enhance small ruminant fattening on pastoralist research group (PRG)  
members in Chifra district of Afar national regional state. Online J. Anim. Feed Res., 10(3): 140-143. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.36380/scil.2020.ojafr19  
RESULT AND DISCUSSION  
In this section the findings/ results of the study are presented and discussed. Accordingly, the body weight gain of the  
experimental sheep & goat fed with grazing + Urea molasses block supplementation (T2) and grazing with supplemented  
with Concentrates mix (T3) and control one/ free grazing (T1) are presented in Table 1. The initial weight of each sheep and  
goat was 18.5kg and 15.5kg respectively. Number of animals was 12 in each of the three treatments (i.e., T1, T2, and T3).  
The final body weight and daily body weight gain was higher 26.5kg final weight in grazing with supplemented with  
Concentrates mix (T3) than grazing + Urea molasses block supplementation (T2) & control one/ free grazing (T1). In other  
words, the result shows, that concentrate feed supplementation (T3) results the highest body weight increment on the  
animals followed by UMMNB feed (T2). On the other hand, free grazing of small ruminants taken as control (T1), gives the  
lowest effect on animals to increase their body weight. The average daily weight gain range in sheep & goat concentrate  
mix supplemented group (T3) are 0.066kg/day & 0.066kg/day respectively. The higher live weight gains of concentrate  
mix supplemented groups(T3) may be due to adequate amount of nutrients in concentrate mixture the CP and energy are  
comparable than Urea molasses block supplementation (T2) & natural grass grazing without supplementation in (T1).  
As table 2 below shows, economic return from goats is slightly higher than sheep under study. This could happen  
because of the community’s food habits. In Afar region, goat is preferred than sheep in their diets. Likewise, goat  
population is higher than sheep in the region. In every households of the pastoral community of the region; goats are the  
dominant animals. This could be resulted from feed availability/browses, environmental, agro-climatic condition of the  
region, genetic make-up of the animals /goats/ adaptability to harsh climate, productivity as well as cultural practices of  
pastoral community in the region.  
The result clearly shows that Urea molasses block supplementation (T2) and concentrate mix supplemented groups  
(T3) has a great influence on body weight gain of small ruminates relative to control one. Fattening of Afar sheep and goat  
with supplementation of cconcentrate feed for three months is highly profitable and brings better average daily weight gain  
as compare to animals feed on Urea molasses block supplementation (T2). The partial budget analysis indicated that small  
ruminant daily weight gain for 4 months with supplementation of concentrate mix supplemented groups (T3) was found to  
give on average economic return of 250 birr per head. For instant six agro-pastoralists in Chifra district has tried to fatten  
six goat & sheep at a time while after four months they sold all goats and they got net earnings of 9000birr. The remaining  
group members have been castrated their male goats for further fattening purpose. Because of this, so money agro-  
pastoralists has been attracted by the business and engaged in small ruminant fattening practices by purchasing some  
animals from market without external advice/support.  
Body weight change and Economic Benefits of Afar Shoat fattening (Sheep & Goat) by feeding UMMNB and  
Table 2 -  
Concentrate Supplementation in Chifra district  
Items  
Grazing +UMMB  
18.5  
Grazing+ Concentrate feed(300gm/DM)  
18.5  
Shee  
Initial weight(kg)  
Goat  
15.5  
15.5  
Shee  
Goat  
25  
22  
6.5  
26.5  
23.5  
8
Final weight(kg)  
Shee  
Weight change with four months (kg)  
Goat  
6.5  
8
Shee  
0.054  
0.054  
0.066  
0.066  
Daily weight gain (kg)  
Goat  
Total cost per trial PRG  
Gross return per trial PRG  
Gross margin per trial PRG  
Total gross output  
Total costs  
1600  
3000  
1700  
3200  
1400  
1500  
18000  
19200  
9600  
10200  
Total gross margin  
Economic return  
8400  
9000  
233 per animal  
250 per animal  
CONCLUSION  
This study aims to evaluate different feed technologies on small ruminants in participatory manner on pastoralist context  
Cottonseed  
through pastoralist research group. Three-hundred-gram concentrate mix /head/day supplementation (49%  
cake  
mixed with 33% wheat bran and 1% salt) of small ruminants (sheep & goat) has better weight gain and economically  
feasible for the chifera woreda established PRG. It was also economical at PRG level, with average gross profit of 250 ETB  
Because of this, so money agro-pastoralists has been attracted by the business and engaged in  
per head in chifera area.  
small ruminant fattening practices by purchasing some animals from market place without external advice/support. In  
142  
Citation: Nuru M and Yasin M, (2020). Participatory evaluation of improved feed technologies to enhance small ruminant fattening on pastoralist research group (PRG)  
members in Chifra district of Afar national regional state. Online J. Anim. Feed Res., 10(3): 140-143. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.36380/scil.2020.ojafr19  
the future animal fattening will be played imperative role to improve the livelihood of the poor pastoralists and agro-  
pastoralists through enhancing the daily income. Besides, agro-pastoralists and extension workers had appreciated  
fattening practice  
with concentrate mix feed supplementation than conventional fattening practice.  
Recommendations  
Even though promising practices had been observed during the study; there are some critical activities has to be  
done in order to increase benefit and support pastoral livelihoods in this endeavor. The following are recommended to be  
done in the future.  
Extending on-farm research and increasing numbers of PRG and numbers of agro-pastoralists in each PRG  
Continuous awareness raising to the communities on how to fatten small ruminates  
Working closely with Agro-pastoralists  
Scale up of on-farm research result  
DECLARATION  
Authors’ contribution  
Mohammed Nuru contributed in all stages of implementation including review and developing the content.  
Mohammed Yasin contributed mainly on data gathering and actual implementation of the trial.  
Acknowledgement  
The authors would wish to acknowledge Eco Fuels Kenya LTD (EFK) for their support through the whole process of  
developing this publication and Mohammed Abduletife for his support and advice in this publication.  
Conflict of interest  
The authors declare they have no competing of interests.  
REFERENCES  
APADB, 2006. Baseline survey made on the Potential, Constraints, and Opportunity on the Production System of 29  
woredas of Afar National Regional State, Afar Pastoral, Agricultural and Development Bureau.  
Alemayehu Mengistu, 2002. Forage production in Ethiopia: A case study with implication for livestock production.  
Ethiopian Society of Animal Production, Ethiopia. Corpus IOD:132666144. CAB Direct I Google Scholar  
Amiri F and Mohamed Shariff AR (2012) Comparison of nutritive values of grasses and legume species using forage  
quality index. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology 34(5): 577-586. Google Scholar I URL:  
CSA, (2007). Ethiopian Statistical Abstract, Central Statistical Authority, 2007, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.  
Njidda A (2010). Chemical composition, fibre fraction and anti-nutritional substances of semi-arid browse forages of north-  
eastern  
Nigeria.  
Nigerian  
Journal  
of  
Basic  
and  
Applied  
Sciences,  
18(2).  
DOI:  
Njidda A, and Nasiru A. (2010). In vitro gas production and dry matter digestibility of tannin-containing forages of semi-arid  
region of north-eastern Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 9(1), 60-66. DOI:  
Njidda A, Olatunji E, and Raji A (2012). Semi-arid browse forages: Their antinutritive substances and in Sacco neutral  
detergent fibre and organic matter degradability., 1(6), 2130. Google Scholar  
Pinkerton B (2005). Forage quality. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service. Forage fact sheet 2. Google Scholar  
143  
Citation: Nuru M and Yasin M, (2020). Participatory evaluation of improved feed technologies to enhance small ruminant fattening on pastoralist research group (PRG)  
members in Chifra district of Afar national regional state. Online J. Anim. Feed Res., 10(3): 140-143. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.36380/scil.2020.ojafr19